Replies to post #686715 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Sogo]

Didn’t Washington Federal challenge c-ship? Status of that suit?

[Fnmaman]

I agree 100% with you.

[Donotunderstand]

could be

and - interestingly - I think such suit is not precluded

[TRCPA]

I dont think challenging the conservatorship itself would have yielded results. However, maybe challenging a number of issues as to how the conservatorship was RUN......besides just the NWS....might have caused a SCOTUS decision to end it as not handled in the best interests of the company.

[bcde]

"That's why I've stated a million times that by NOT challenging the validity and legality of the actual Conservatorship, and not just the NWS within the C-Ship, the plaintiffs attorneys made a fatal mistake, which can NOT be re-visited now."

Agree. The FnF Conservatorship has been well orchestrated scam even long before HERA was passed.

Constitution clearly prohibits making laws to target individuals or individual companies. Plaintiffs attorneys have never questioned validity of HERA that has targeted private companies FnF but does nothing to other private companies that are engaged in similar business.

Why conservatorship rules are different for FnF? SCOTUS should have addressed this aspect. SCOTUS may have started the process of destroying free market capitalism with this ruling. Conservatorship and receivership are very important roles in free market capitalism and Judiciary has messed up the understanding of these roles. With this SCOTUS ruling why would anyone invest in any ventures that involve Gov.

May be it is to time have some checks and balances on SCOTUS.