Replies to post #12248 on CYIOS Corporation (CYIO)

[Axle-and-Hub]

That's what its all about.

Greetings Xeroe,

Since April of 2020 I've been doing Due Diligence activity on the implications of Crypto and Negative Interest Rate motivators (and frequently suggesting others do a lot more due diligence than the simple stuff anyone can do. Of course all since that time I've also been doing similar efforts regarding Sanitizers (non-alcohol). As well as testing some theories I've had about shareholder participation and "lack there of" regarding CYIO - and I've learned some very insightful things by that testing.

I don't talk much about my D.D. efforts because I have no desire to educate competitors or the people that are not shareholder focused.

The issues to me are not that eventually Cyio does not have financially generating opportunities - but rather "WHEN" they have them. IMO too many want to consider only the most obvious easy to find and understand situations and then project huge far-too-simple assumptions into them.

Its one of the reasons why I don't favor all that conflict potential with crypto/paloma pay concerns. The gov't whether FED, Treasury or both are going to fight such a situation which is exactly why cannabis sellers still after all these years including even with legal approval to sell - still can't access the Federal/State banking systems. But the concept of "negative interest" is a far easier battle to win domestically and select internationally and the Fed or Treasury won't fight that battle "directly". IMO

But faster income generation at this stage of the game is sanitizers with finding specific choice preferred prospects or possibly something ties into "the 3rd and 4th choices of crypto related activity (not Paloma and not Propy). So you understand maybe my reasoning about Paloma but why not Propy?

Just think of the very 1st example they tested and used - using Arrington didn't matter - but using a Russian property . . . what were they thinking ?

So what are the 3rd and 4th choices? I think select crowd funding methods - and the 4th is an association with the new advising board member I'd mentioned the other day - recognize she has an operation that is actually making money compared to the others. She strikes me as someone (for 13 years) has her focus on the right targets - of course it is a brief description :-)

And in the mean time - the opportunity to sell sanitizer (non-alcohol) I think is far better than virtually anyone realizes - but at this time definitely not to the general public - only targeted prospects to get our
"investment interest" balance fixed (and get our share price where it should be - not these little pittance share price numbers.

It appears We are sitting on our hands regarding sanitizers on the one side and the areas I think more likely earlier to be approved on the Helio side. The progression to "how soon to actually money making" is my key concern (without legal or regulator entanglements- that has been and continues to be exactly what my posts are always about.

jmho