Replies to post #1029 on -Top Gainer - DD// - (deet)

[deet49]

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties through undersigned counsel that the above-captioned action is dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The parties further stipulate that each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses.

PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED STATUS REPORT REGARDING SERVICE UPON FOREIGN DEFENDANTS (06/18/21)

Plaintiffs, through their undersigned counsel, respectfully submit their Amended Status Report Regarding Service Upon Foreign Defendants. On June 1, 2021, pursuant to the Court’s May 26, 2021 Order (Dkt. 39), Plaintiffs submitted their Status Report Regarding Service Upon Foreign Defendants (Dkt. 41), reporting, inter alia, “[t]hat the process of serving the remaining foreign defendants remains underway.” The foreign defendants who have not been served are Inversiones Ibersuizas S.A.; Holcim Trading SA (F/K/A) Union Maritima Internacional SA; de Ruiter Ouderlande B.V.; and Las Pailas de Cemento S.A.U. (“Foreign Defendants”).*In addition, Plaintiffs informed the Court that Plaintiffs and LafargeHolcim had “reached an agreement in principle to settle this action in its entirety” and that the parties were “working diligently to consummate their settlement agreement and expect that the agreement will be completed on or before June 28, 2021.” (Dkt. 41). * Plaintiffs did not request that Clerk of the Court issue a summons to Defendant Unknown Subsidiary of the LafargeHolcim Group.

The settlement was finalized on June 17, 2021. Immediately after the settlement was finalized, Plaintiffs’ counsel instructed Plaintiffs’ vendor, TransPerfect Legal Solutions, to request cancellation of Hague Convention service upon the Foreign Defendants. TransPerfect has confirmed that its foreign partner has requested cancellation of service upon the Foreign Defendants. HCMLY h ttps://www.cubatrade.org/blog/2021/6/25/c3jwa630da63op8aldrdfsug9du9c4

GO FRAZ
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=164545926

[deet49]

Answer Provided
Rule 15c2-11 (the amended Rule)
Exceptions
The amended Rule contains a series of exceptions that permit quoting without regard for the requirements of the amended Rule, other than compliance with the conditions of the exemption.

2. Unsolicited Customer Indication Exception. Permits quotes that represent a customer’s unsolicited indication of interest, subject to certain conditions, including that quotes containing both a priced bid and a priced offer must be identified as unsolicited customer interest and that quotes for company insiders and affiliates may not be published under this exception unless the issuer information is current and publicly available. A broker-dealer posting the quote may reasonably rely on a written representation received on the day of the quote and prior to submitting the quote that a person is not a company insider or affiliate. Alternatively, the broker-dealer may rely on a publicly available determination from a qualified interdealer quotation system or an exchange.

only absolute trash will fall away off the pinkos
good news for anyone with
a focused investment that's not run by a predator CEO

GLTA