Yikes… let’s take it from the top:
“I’m baffled that Nader continues to get a pass.
This is 100% on him. Everyone is loving on Recknor- akin to Tony, Pestell, Mahboob etc. Then they become the villain and Nader snickers and walks away.”
You forgot BP.
“Investors should make no mistake about yesterday’s call. It was an unmitigated disaster and the share price will be reflective of that. This is not shorts or market makers, nor the 13D group. Why would they take a loss when they believe their plan will increase shareholder value.”
An unmitigated disaster? That’s awfully dramatic. It was just an update surrounding not yet fully analyzed but unblinded LH data. It is not CYDY’s job to manage outlandish expectations.
“What came out of that call was simply: NOTHING”
Opinion. Not one I agree with. Check the tape.
“BLA completion MAYBE by October then submission
No revenue- said it was just from “Compassionate Use”
No purchase orders and they went OUT OF THEIR WAY to dispel the 200k purchase. They even quoted the original PR. If this wasn’t a CYA comment, I don’t know what is”
There is now literally a BLA road map for each section with dates. CR has done well to not only get the BLA back in motion, but also to communicate it to us clearly. PI has ALWAYS been CSP. They have only ever said the 200k were reserved for PI. As has been noted, the CSP structure places a lot of risk on PI physicians and medical institutions and the FDA going “OUT OF THEIR WAY to” withhold a safe and effective treatment despite the need even outside of its borders did not help inspire confidence in risk on use in PI.
“Brazil and Phillipines are more than six months away from anything. BP is light years ahead in R&D for Covid.”
What? What timeline is this? What BP? What R&D? Light years? LOL, please.
“Current trial is 56 patients and EXPLORATORY. Talk about humoring Nader.”
It is exploratory. This is shat it is. I’m sure NP would take an EUA based off of it though. What is humoring NP?
“My price prediction of $1.50 then $.75 is with more confidence now especially when Nader was setting the table for dilution!”
Predictions about SP require more. What timeframe? There is nothing to just saying random numbers and saying one is more confident about them providing no supporting details. This is what people criticize NP for. What dilution, what is this based on?
“Hang on tight”
This is good advice, however there are certainly people who are not hanging on tight to their shares.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
