Stockman,
Certainly not disputing the cost numbers but if I am a station owner, I don't put my business at risk selling a fuel there is no data on ...... regardless of cost. It might be 10-20 cents cheaper at the pump but consumers will have to visit the pump more often the higher the methanol content. So on an "equivalent" basis, that isn't likely going to be cheaper.
And I'm very aware EcoFlex96 can only run in flex fuel vehicle.
No question that in the overall picture that methanol is more environmentally friendly.
But Cyberfuels 3rd grade website offers zero to back up your statements. Just sayin, Cyberfuels has published nothing to back up the claims on potential blends that might be available.
I mean anyone can google Cyberfuels and Olsen and find PRs from years ago. Funny to see link provided to results on Cyberfuels site that is no longer present. LOL. Seems strange indeed. I also have some of the stats from those test results as well.
Amigo Mike