InvestorsHub Logo

jsc52033

06/08/21 11:29 AM

#564 RE: Pat #562

companies do hiher PR firms to do articles about the product but not particularly their own.
You are right to watch for the company name to appear in an article not jst the product.

Obtuse Eye

06/08/21 3:35 PM

#565 RE: Pat #562

I understand what you are saying. Because I have seen what you mentioned in other spaces.

Here is a question for you, more like a call for guidance for those seeking to post DD vs. informational material.

Can you differentiate for folks, what makes the two items what they are? Because I think some folks don't know what DD is more than it is 'related to' what it is they are doing, so to them it is DD.

Myself, I look at it from a directly related facts-based approach. For instance, on the Discord space, they have a section for 'News', a section for 'announcements', and a section for 'due-diligence'. When someone posts something in the due-diligence section that is conjecture I feel like that is the wrong classification for it.

Due-diligence would be something that is confirmed progress, contracts, patents (filed & issued), hirings/firings, raising capital, partnerships, announcement of splits, increasing shares count, other historical company related facts, etc...