InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

DiceMaker

06/07/21 11:41 AM

#128021 RE: SPORT19 #128019

So you know what the redactions say?
icon url

Beast19

06/07/21 12:15 PM

#128024 RE: SPORT19 #128019

We are very familiar with the heavily redacted agreement. Again, you post these as facts when they are not. No proof - again and again
icon url

Mharb46

06/07/21 12:54 PM

#128028 RE: SPORT19 #128019

So your supposition is that MDT, while they valued 1/3 of this IP, don't value it enough that they wouldn't want others to have it? Or that intricate parts of the IP dont dovetail into the others?

Further you supposition is that they don't desire the remnant of IP even more so?

Is there any FACT basis that MDT won't pay 10x this price for the remaining IP? There isn't. So your spouting off about something that has little known bearing on any outcome.

It is a fact you have no clue about what is going to transpire in the next few months. Hope you're not short still much prefer you to make money with us instead of your odd agenda.
icon url

Beast19

06/07/21 4:22 PM

#128048 RE: SPORT19 #128019

First you scream about "FACTs" which are indeed false and of your opinion like below. Now you are crying about your opinion.

Which one is it?

Again- let's see some evidence of your FACTs or of anything at all relating to how you formed your opinion.


Why would TMDI allow a board seat, no royalties to their IP, and spend time/money to co-develop new tech with MDT that would take away future marketshare for either party? Connect the dots.


Message in reply to IREPSuRgtech19 quote:
It is a FACT- they will walk away 1/3 of the IP for $41 million. No future payments or royalties.
It’s all in the agreement.