InvestorsHub Logo

mdimport

06/06/21 11:37 AM

#203459 RE: Alyssa #203456

We disagree on this.

No one here is drinking Koolaid.


These discussions one presumes would be fact based:
- pending DOJ litigation
- the possibility of additional SEC litigation
- guilty pleas that have already been made (DOJ / criminal cases)
- fines and bans issued by the SEC (civil not criminal)
- lack of any financials since 2015
- attempts to evade filing financials and the misleading and false statements made to investors
- fake COVID tests on the corporate website
- zero proof of shareholder value creation outside of an attempted $70 million insurance and Medicare fraud
- other litigation $ARYC already lost (such as the Mexican university)
- misleading statements /puffery on social media, etc.

Why can't people have discussions


So is the Lego false analogy.

It is so juvenile.


There is a fact based discussion over whether and when $ARYC will be delisted. IMO $ARYC will be delisted whether or not it produces those missing years of financials.

There's a subjective discussion as to when the SEC should have acted. IMO the SEC was at fault for not having acted in 2017 or 2018, and instead waiting until 2020 when Mark and Rene Schena pulled the COVID test scam.

There's an economic discussion worth having as to whether $ARYC will survive or will file Chapter 7. Theranos in fact followed that same Chapter 7 route after their scam was busted.

There's a legal discussion as to whether or not Rene Schena will be criminally prosecuted by the DOJ.

There's another discussion as to whether any company would wish to be a counterparty to (seller to or buyer from) $ARYC once the legal has all been concluded.

So yes, lots to discuss.