InvestorsHub Logo

Hoghead7

06/05/21 10:59 AM

#37237 RE: Hoghead7 #37236

Tick tock!

WeTheMarket

06/05/21 4:36 PM

#37241 RE: Hoghead7 #37236

Hoghead the fuel cell vs. solar numbers as stated by Jason Few in the following article are even better (i.e., by a factor of 395 to 1) “Big Ideas That Might Change The World In The Next Few Years”

Here is the relevant excerpt from the article:
"There are other advantages as well. Our entire system is extremely compact and power-dense, delivering 10 megawatts per acre (compared to an intermittent solar system that would require approximately 395 acres of land to produce the same amount of power), so our fuel cells can be situated close to where power is needed. And our systems are designed for the circular economy - we recycle 93% of the materials in our platforms and products and put them back into productive use. I could go on and on!"

Also, wind and solar are not as green as many believe (see first plot below, even wind and solar have green house gas emissions). Here are some relevant slides from a presentation promoting Nuclear Power. Looking at the last plot, Solar to Nuclear land use is 5850/20 or 292 to 1, so fuel cells at 395 to 1 (as shown above) is even more efficient than Nuclear Power.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------