Replies to post #681395 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[FFFacts]

FALSE.

Here's the language from J. Thomas's dissent: "The Act defines “exceeds authorized access” as “to access
a computer with authorization and to use such access to ob-
tain or alter information in the computer that the accesser
is not entitled so to obtain or alter.” §1030(e)(6).

That is not the same thing as "UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS"

Do you know what quotation marks mean?

https://www.grammarly.com/blog/quotation-marks/
We use quotation marks with direct quotes, with titles of certain works, to imply alternate meanings, and to write words as words.

That's right and the General powers of a Conservator to preserve and conserve their wards assets overrules these incidental powers.

Not according to a textualist.

The majority opinion is simply stating that the Criminal statute MUST BE CONSTRUED AS WRITTEN.

Yes, hence a textualist point of view.

Maybe I am confused as to what you mean by "Textualist". How is J. Thomas, Roberts and Alito NOT Textualists but ACB, Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Kagan, Sotomayor, and Breyer ARE Textualists?

The law stated above is defined as written that is what at textualist meaning is.

Isn't the job of ALL Judges to read and interpret the Laws? Can a "textualist" Judge rule differently in one type of case versus another and when?

Read and interpret everyone interprets things differently. That's why you see a dissent both sides saw it differently. A strict textualist would rule strictly on the text.