Replies to post #681265 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[RumplePigSkin]

Lamberth? Who cares?

Here is the high level - the same defenses used in the lower courts aren't used before SCOTUS b.c SCOTUS would laugh them out of the court.

Lower courts don't want to overturn congressional laws, that's a job for SCOTUS.

[FFFacts]

I responded to you and now all you do is change the subject. Explain to me your logic behind

ALL THE COURTS AGREE

Where lamberth and several other cases following the lamberth logic agreed.

I never said I found lamberths reasoning convincing.

[Donotunderstand]

even my forgetful brain and memory

remembers - a poster - warning all of us - of the wording of 4617f

it is clear

there are no ifs and or buts to the wording

courts leave the conservator to do what they do and no second guessing

it took context - looking for meaning and intent in the law and its words to say ------ clearly Congress meant courts stay out when the coservator is taking ANY action that conserves ----------- but when its destructive that can not be the intent and meaning of the law ------- the EN BANC - in my non legal and not category mind said ---- the actions go way beyond anything any rational law writer intended or foresaw --- and when it is this bad and so wrong - clearly the court can not sit bye and point to some TEXT and say sorry but we are castrated mice