InvestorsHub Logo

rawman

06/02/21 9:02 AM

#128655 RE: Moving On #128654

If this trends in the right direction it will trade at a multiple of earnings.


Let's not confuse the accounting metrics! "Revenue" is NOT "earnings", thus multiples of revenue means little to nothing to investors! Using revenue as a variable, does not yield the claimed P/E improvement!

FYI, as pointed out in an earlier post, the P/E will trend worse as more newly printed SPRV shares are dumped into market. By definition this MUST happen for the business to expand. It's called "DILUTION" and it continues to happen big-time here at SPRV!

dss19552002

06/02/21 11:04 AM

#128660 RE: Moving On #128654

I think for a REIT, the proper metric is funds from operations. But, I am not experienced with REITS. I think a share price of 0.02 is a fair price at the moment, but multiples of "earnings" might take it to 0.06. That's from very very rough calculations, and just approximations. So, I can't really defend those calculations.

I disagree with your calculations about 1 building bringing $0.005, then 10 buildings would bring $0.05. If to get those 10 buildings, they need to add 5 billion shares, then the 10 buildings might still bring $0.005. I used a large number of shares, but you get the picture. There are a lot of variables to be considered. But as a first rough calculations, it isn't too bad.

To your point about the buildings managed by Granite, and formerly "owned" by Summit, it seems that a couple of those buildings appear to be owned by smaller LLC's, and they don't list Summit as the former owner, if I recall. So, those buildings are structured like the 1094 Military Trail LLC building, owned by smaller LLC's which Summit may have owned. Note also that at least one of the Greenville NC buildings mentioned earlier are about owning the building, and not the land associated with the building, if I read the tax records correctly.