InvestorsHub Logo

SoxFan

05/27/21 8:26 AM

#51369 RE: jaymark #51368

Well they have had plenty of engineers who have been highly praised here and have produced nothing of value. How long should longs wait? Until all is lost?

zerosnoop

05/27/21 9:06 AM

#51371 RE: jaymark #51368

I believe engineer Shannon worked on the AOT unit in the past. It seems by recent updates from QS, Dr Gallagher is doing most of the engineering work now. Without the new ceo raising funds, then engineer Gallagher couldn't do what he needs to do. As per the most recent update, Gallagher knows what needs to be done to get the unit working. With funding, Gallagher will have the resources to get the job done.

The following is a statement from Dr. Gallagher:

“Heavy oil is a challenge to transport and a device that reduces pressure in a pipeline will allow more oil to be transported at the same cost. I remain excited about the potential of the science behind the AOT to be a novel solution for heavy oil pipelines. Given the interest QSE has received recently from prospective customers it seems the industry still wants the AOT unit.

I would like to continue to help QSE find and solve the problem with the AOT and help turn the situation around.




















zerosnoop

05/27/21 9:09 AM

#51372 RE: jaymark #51368

The below quote tells me things are moving forward with engineer Gallagher

we hope to put Dr. Gallagher’s plans into action in early 2021.
















zerosnoop

05/27/21 9:12 AM

#51373 RE: jaymark #51368

In parallel, we would also like to build a variety of test fixtures to stress test materials in the presence of oil. Most materials are studied dry to determine their mechanical and electrical properties. Since we have successfully powered the AOT to about 10,000V in air without short formation, we should consider and test the possibility the short circuit is the result of an interaction between the internal AOT materials and the oil which develops under AOT operating conditions.





















mr_sano

05/28/21 10:28 AM

#51378 RE: jaymark #51368

Jaymark..the problem is the inventor and scientific head of the company is a pseudo scientist who’s papers theories and prototypes are no where near the standards of developing a new technology for pipeline operation. Over 50M has been predominantly spent on salaries and overhead including the 500k failed test they recently botched.

The problem for me is that Tao or Temple never takes the heat or answers any questions. I haven’t seen a comment or new paper from Tornado Tao for years! The university is no better and simply sits back collecting licensing and grant fees and interest for years! Until the University, more specifically Tao, is held accountable for the ongoing misrepresentations of facts then companies like Qsep will continue to purchase legitimacy through this pay to play system Temple has in place. This is a crime in my book but very hard to prevail. At some point in history somebody will bring a successful lawsuit against this type of grift!