Replies to post #43459 on 12 Retech Corp (fka RETC)

[NewTrader2017]

I disagree, If current management could have made more money by accepting GS they would had done that.

They wanted to run it by their own because they have plans, they will bring this current and prove some good reverse merger, they already brought that guy yesterday for testimony who does Billion dollar reverse merger. He said he has brought 1.5M dollar firm to 2.5B into merger.

I am excited to see what current management can do. I am not a great fan of GS, though I am into GVSI because of his past performance. I love money, not GS .

[samsamsamiam]

Do you trust George to actually file a shareholder derivative lawsuit?
Let’s see if he keeps his word on that.

George Sharp
@GeorgeASharp
·
15m
Didn't want to announce this until after the case was heard, but I have already retained counsel to file a derivative Breach of Fiduciary Duty case against the current officers and directors of $RETC win or lose. They don't get to decide when or if the shareholders are important.


George Sharp
@GeorgeASharp
·
4m
Before y'all ask, "without prejudice" means she may grant the restraining order on a subsequent motion if $RETC does not file by June 30th. It was expensive, but at least I forced the corp to become current.



George Sharp
@GeorgeASharp
·
4m
The fight goes on. $RETC shareholders must be considered. Ponzetta decided it was more important to pay himself than keep the corporation in good standing and keep the SEC filings current. He will have to answer for that.