Let's see if I understand this BAT-SHIT theory:
The inventor of the technology and founder of the company, a self-admitted fraudster, left a decade ago and publicly announced that the technology and company weren't good investments.
In the subsequent decade, the company has completely ceased all operations, and hasn't done JACK-SHIT.
ZERO REVENUE, NO EMPLOYEES, NO OPERATIONS, NO PLAN.
But, the share price has decreased because of "hedge fund interference"?
Not because P2O has been a revenueless inactive shell for a decade with a founder who says the technology is shit?
Okaaaaaayyyyyyyyy...........