InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

sgolds

10/26/03 11:21 AM

#15921 RE: greg s #15915

greg s,

As for your grammatical corection, "If I was Elmer" is indeed correct as the comparison is singular and the singular verb should be correctly used. "If I were Elmer" is often commonly used, but the use does not make it correct.

Sometimes the rules of grammar are in dispute - one of the wonderful things about a living language. In such situations I fall back on the advice freely given many times by William Safire: If it sounds funny, don't use it.

To my ear, if I was Elmer sounds funny. One has to accept if I were Elmer to be a valid exception to the rule. Here is why:

There is actually a subtle usage distinction - they don't mean the same thing. If I was Elmer describes a state in which the speaker was Elmer in the past, but isn't Elmer currently, as in Abigail Van Buren was Dear Abby, but the title passed on to a new writer after Ms. Van Buren's death.

If I were Elmer is used for the situation where the identity held in the past continues to the present.
icon url

dougSF30

10/26/03 12:01 PM

#15930 RE: greg s #15915

greg, As for your grammatical corection, "If I was Elmer" is indeed correct as the comparison is singular and the singular verb should be correctly used.

Wrong, again! Here's a hint greg-- two words: subjunctive case.

http://www.bartleby.com/64/C001/061.html

Doug