That all makes sense, but the first line of the excerpt said "No drugs are recommended for prophylaxis against infection and hospital admission".
"The trial design will show a prophylaxis for disease progression, if B does sufficiently in clinical work what it did in lab studies."
Doesn't "a prophylaxis for disease progression" describe a treatment versus a prophylaxis? The prophylactic effect described by Dr. A.... and the Company itself involved the prevention of infection, not the progress of it.
"The article laments the low efficacy of Remdesivir" as a treatment to inhibit the progress of the disease.
Hopefully B will be more effective in slowing and reversing that progress, but I don't think of that as prophylaxis.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
