InvestorsHub Logo

buccaneer1961

05/14/21 9:29 PM

#41113 RE: QServus #41111

Yes..old management...not g.s.

TradersQue

05/14/21 10:59 PM

#41116 RE: QServus #41111

Same old George Sharp tactics. Look what I did, then look at what you did. Never his fault the dilution runs wild. Those who think he's unaware have lost some marbles. This is what he is best at. Work a deal everyone wins but retail. Look around, what happened to Lazar. He was a closer.

stoxblox

05/15/21 10:12 AM

#41138 RE: QServus #41111

Awesome!... then its "clearly abundant" (whatever that means) that you should sell me all your shares.
Just looking out for ya...

buccaneer1961

05/15/21 10:55 AM

#41140 RE: QServus #41111

Am I getting thru to you??

Smilin_B

06/11/21 12:54 AM

#43933 RE: QServus #41111

Guess what ?

Im going to make a shit ton of money off of RETC from the trips

KeithPB50

06/27/21 10:52 AM

#44818 RE: QServus #41111

Maybe they diluted so they can let George get the company on the 30th and they know full well that their share prices will skyrocket under Sharp doing a reverse merger. “Everything is not what it appears...”

It makes zero sense for any shareholder to contest a GS custodianship as the stock will go up 20-100 fold under Sharp and if old management keeps the company, the stock just falls back to near zero levels.

Why would anyone holding tens of millions of shares NOT WANT their share prices to go up 1,000%-10,000%???

Makes no sense to NOT let GS have the company and get mega-wealthy!! imho