What other way am I supposed to translate things? The stock is at .03 Shana, and yet another promising LOI has fallen through. Many shareholders hung on through the split because of this deal. If closing it would have caused massive dilution, then I'm obviously glad they didn't. But just like they knew the huge real estate LOI's would encourage buying, they also knew the huge Ins LOI would encourage it. And as with both situations, the reasons behind not closing on all of those LOI's should have been, and likely were, evident prior to press releasing the letters of intent. Again, it's the pattern of things that disturbs me. Surely in the back of your mind, you see this too, even just slightly?
I am truly baffled as to how you can continue to defend the company like this. I'm not sure what Mr. B told you in regards to the insurance LOI, what excuse he may or may not have given you this time, but I encourage you to open your mind to the fact that anyone is capable of lying to anyone.
All IMO
This will be my last post on the board for some time. Good luck everyone.