InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Come to Papa

05/13/21 10:57 PM

#29344 RE: tchalla #29343

Why the hard on for BLLB and Kim? CE removal must be getting close and shorty is scared!
icon url

Technerdist

05/14/21 6:33 AM

#29347 RE: tchalla #29343

Oh yeah Challa. Real likely that Kim wasted so much time, effort, and capitol on BLLB when it's a dead shell. The CE will come off and when it does you're going to vanish. Toodleloo wanker.
icon url

mplscubfan

05/14/21 7:24 AM

#29350 RE: tchalla #29343

What a joke here. Still CE? Why isn't everyone asking for a "Kim Removal?"
icon url

ITalkDuringMovies

05/14/21 9:26 AM

#29352 RE: tchalla #29343

The reason the CE is still on is because CE's take a long time to remove once they've been put on. It is totally reasonable for OTC Markets to be stringent in assessing the removal of this very serious restriction/sanction. From their perspective, BLLB is a dead company and people shouldn't buy it until there is 100% proof that a viable business model that poses no risk to investors has assumed operations. With every other ticker with this warning label that you look at that has gone through or is currently going through the identical process of being cleaned up (ie. JZZI, SGMD, GMPW), the removal process takes *at least* six months. It is not a fast process. That said, no one starts a project like this, invests this much time, money, and energy, without knowing there will be a profitable outcome. Has everything happened that needs to right now to make this work? Maybe. Maybe we're just waiting. I have a hard time believing that. I think there is probably a little bit more that needs to get done. Who knows. I don't work for OTCMarkets or Triage. But what I do feel remarkably confident about is that whatever needs to get done still will. It just makes no sense at all for it not to get done.