I somewhat agree with ThomasS that these were just motions. I am sure DNA/TRCA will somehow make motion that these laws are taken out of context or doesn't pertain in these particular instances.
But, I like what I read in INSM motions. This is the first time I feel confident of no injunction. In fact, I've lost a little bit(avg. $1.43 with a load of shares) and was hoping to catch a spike and get out. I now feel like I need to ride this out possibly for a few years.
I sincerely hope that the patent dates quoted are correct!!! I'm sleeping a little bit better. I have lot of my retirement and kids college funds tied up in INSM.
Thomas and Smallinvestor, Thomas I believe you misread my post as no where did I assume legal victory while I did state my opinion on an injunction and the value of my opinion. The declarations are strong indicators for the science and business end and that was what my opinion was mainly about. The declarations must have an impact on the four factor test for injunction, that is their only purpose. I have not made a prediction on that outcome. You may want to read my post again to get the point.
Smallinvestor you are making assumptions that are not supported by anything except a well written motion from one side. The motion from TRCA/DNA was well written and I am sure their answer will be well written.
Thank you all for keeping the board clean and a good place for honest discussion.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
