InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

TikiGal

01/21/07 12:14 PM

#24379 RE: The Real Deal #24370

"Future financing
The greater number of financing options available to publicly held companies is a primary reason to undergo a reverse takeover. These financing options include:

The issuance of additional stock in a secondary offering
An exercise of warrants, where stockholders have the right to purchase additional shares in a company at predetermined prices. When many shareholders with warrants exercise their option to purchase additional shares, the company receives an infusion of capital.
Other investors are more likely to invest in a company via a private offering of stock when a mechanism to sell their stock is in place should the company be successful.
In addition, the now-publicly held company obtains the benefits of public trading of its securities:

Increased liquidity of company stock
Higher company valuation due to a higher share price
Greater access to capital markets
Ability to acquire other companies through stock transactions
Ability to use stock incentive plans to attract and retain employees"
icon url

ronjon41

01/21/07 12:21 PM

#24392 RE: The Real Deal #24370

The real deal, you are so wrong. they're have been plenty of sucessful reverse mergers. just check out this link.
http://www.shellstockreview.com/ssr-Home.html
icon url

Zorro

01/21/07 12:35 PM

#24410 RE: The Real Deal #24370

Since you've done so much research, please explain to everyone all the options available for a private company to go public?
icon url

lesnshawn

01/21/07 1:27 PM

#24436 RE: The Real Deal #24370

TRD: But, often times it's been decided BY THE SHAREHOLDERS that going public will reap them more of a benefit and compensation for the money that they put up to begin with...for the whole lot of them!

A company like Aero had many original investors that want to get paid. Many of which just put up their risk capital with little involvement in the day/day operations.

You think "ramping up" at this rate can be done with a simple business loan from your local bank? No, you're right. It took the help of many hands and most likely a big boost from a couple key players.

http://www.aeroexhaust.com/technology.html
(the video's quite nice;)

"A SHORT HISTORY OF AERO EXHAUST

The Aero Exhaust Company was formed in 1999 in order to develop an idea for a new type of vehicle exhaust. The Aero Exhaust company has evolved from a couple of reducers built in a garage, to a global manufacturing and distribution company with the most technologically advanced muffler in the world today. After three years of research and development the Aero Exhaust was finally perfected. In January of 2003, the company began aggressively marketing the Aero Exhaust product in its current form. The Aero Exhaust product has been met with enormous industry acceptance and demand. The Aero Exhaust has been approved for a US patent (patent 6,679,351) on its innovations and development in the exhaust industry.
"

Now, if the company was ran and completely funded by a very very very (under five) small group of people that all played a key role in the operations of the company, then yes, staying private would likely be the most beneficial to the owners.

R/M's happen more than you think, er, more than you care to let on that you know. And you know there's nothing disrespectful or shady about going this route to being public, nothing at all. Unfortunately as of late though, some other high profile penny stocks gave the process a bad name.

You can't argue that the buzz about Aero is just starting to hit on all cylinders and this company's getting noticed, BIG TIME!

To involve themselves in a pink sheet R/M scam without doing their own exhaustive DD on this shell and past/current officers of the company's many twists and turns, flies in the face of better judgement.

Also, da ya think it's possible NASCAR may have a finger or two in this pie? Hmmmm??? Ever wonder how Aero got so far so fast (relatively speaking) and on an inside track w/ NASCAR to boot? I wonder to and I know that often times in business, as we see it demonstrated time and time again, the fastest way to the top is by getting their via an "inside track".

But, I'm sure you'll do your best to try and convince folks here of the illegitemacy of the whole deal, FCCN, AERO and then the officers themselves...that, "they're all the same...yada, yada, yada..."

lns