So I saw this post or one very similar before mentioning the 33% theory. While I believe this is well-intended, I completely disagree with that theory. There is no way imo they are divided up evenly like that. Just like anything in life, the more successful and well-known one entity becomes so that percentage of attention it grows larger, the more market share it demands, the more the price adjustment increases. Even if you had 10 different tickers an individual was working to gain custodianship and they all had issues and paper work slowing the process down and extra debt, but one was going through at lightning pace and was the cleanest shell. That one would not only be the most dominant and the percentage for it. But, also regarding the most time and effort would be much much higher than any others because the risk is removed compared to all the others and it can be prepped as a true candidate for a potential suitor for reverse merger.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
