InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Wise Man

05/09/21 12:01 AM

#677399 RE: Wise Man #677396

Also the plaintiffs brought a flawed constitutionality claim, because they don't signal a provision in the law that makes the FHFA unconstitutional.
The Scotus-appointed amicus said that the FHFA-C is constitutional because it has limited powers. But using his same arguments, the FHFA-R is unconstitutional, because it has "coercive power" in the director's duty: "the activities of FnF must be consistent with the Public Interest."
icon url

955

05/09/21 6:46 PM

#677419 RE: Wise Man #677396

Careful, that's Rick's gf you're talking about. CFPB ruling pretty strong precedent and courts love precedent.