Replies to post #40108 on 12 Retech Corp (fka RETC)

[nodummy]

It wasn't final. Therefore, it was temporary.

Sharp is requesting an emergency order the same day that he files the petition for all of his custodianship petitions, before the defendant has even been served.

What do you think is going to happen to that emergency order if the defendant responds and contests? It is going to be terminated so that the court can provide both parties with due process.

This isn't about George Sharp "doing the right thing". The judge is/was going to set aside the order no matter what for the case to be argued fairly in court.

It wasn't Sharp who submitted the request to set aside the order. It was the RETC attorney. And the court agreed.

https://www.washoecourts.com/Query/CaseInformation/CV21-00780



George misled investors by presenting the custodianship order as a done deal - as if the RETC shell was his, end of case.



His misleading tweet caused the stock price to gap way up and put a lot of investors in the red.

He can back track, pretend he never said it, and spin it all he wants, but it doesn't change the facts.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=163655719

Him being the custodian of RETC was never a done deal. And now it looks very unlikely to ever happen.

The same thing is going to happen with MEIL if the MEIL owners respond to that case. Any emergency order will be set aside for the court to provide both parties with due process, and he will likely lose that shell.