InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

whitedeer

05/07/21 11:56 AM

#109591 RE: Boersi #109590

After the r/s stock was at 7 cents
icon url

uvaphd

05/07/21 12:29 PM

#109592 RE: Boersi #109590

While it is true that the pre R/S value (.0002) is roughly the same as today’s split-adjusted value (.0002233), how is that GOOD news in consideration of (1) the OS has ballooned again to over 1B when it was well under 100M pre-split, (2) the R/S clearly did little to increase the PPS (which we have determined is essentially unchanged) and (3) in consequence of (2) we suffered a reduction by 1:150 for no real gain in terms of PPS—meantime my ability to growth wealth with each organic increase of .0001 was obliterated. How is ANY of this good?! Lastly, let’s also recall that certain individuals who were principally involved with the company were on social media LONG before the R/S (back in early 2018) crowing about the efficacy of CaverStem—which drove the PPS up to .07–but it crashed to the aforementioned .0002 when the company failed to provide: (1) timely news on CaverStem’s efficacy by their inability to publish a long-anticipated paper for countless months (how does one reconcile this with the social media claims just referenced—either the claims were false or the company indolent, whether purposely or through inertia brought on by incompetence?), (2) a REAL plan to “commercialize” (their word) CaverStem (as opposed to the PATHETIC non-growth we have seen, with only a veritable handful of doctors WORLDWIDE offering this “landmark” procedure—which ought to sell ITSELF if it’s as effective as advertised), and finally (3) a clear, comprehensive, and compelling BUSINESS PLAN showing how they will translate IP into revenues (either what they have is worth nowhere near what they believe it is, or they are hopelessly incompetent at promotion and execution). The foregoing represents a large share of the CONTEXT attending your claim—and it contains unassailable facts. Please feel free to correct my argument in any place you can using empirical, explicit evidence to the contrary—that would only result in an increased strength through argumentative refinement. In the absence of such correctives, I’ll view it as sufficiently strong as written.
icon url

tortiello

05/07/21 1:27 PM

#109593 RE: Boersi #109590

the jimmy carter story....stage 4 brain cancer......secret trips to mass general..........6 months later ct scan revealed NO CANCER