The Monitor said once that the "tangible assets were sold" meaning "hey we sold everything we physically had to sell" and it gets clung to as if the Monitor was using "tangible" as its accounting definition and implying that the intangible assets were not sold. The same Monitor who said they sold all the assets and shareholders would be getting nothing. Again and again. And they also posted the transaction in its entirety with, you guessed it, ALL the intangible assets listed as sold. Not to mention it was a liquidation, which of course always means the selling of everything possible for the benefit of lenders.
The logical leaps required to maintain this conspiracy are so hard to fathom I wonder if its not just a ruse.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
