It seems that there are appealable issues. No way to tell at this point which Judges you draw on the panel at CAFC. Even if you know which Judges are on the panel it's a roll of the dice.
The issue that sticks out to me is Casper didn't want to hear from counsel, for WDDD, on part 2 of Alice 101 test. That should be an appealable issue. However, case could get returned to Casper with instructions to hear from counsel in part 2. That doesn't mean it changes the outcome. It is entirely possible for her to hear counsel on part 2 and still rule against them (as we already know what she thinks and will likely do what she can to support her ruling). Or perhaps it changes her mind, but in my opinion that is not likely.
If the CAFC determined that Casper got the 101 issue wrong and overturned her ruling that would be a different story - great news. Either way it is an uphill battle.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
