Replies to post #145285 on NanoViricides Inc. (NNVC)

[Its_lose_not_loose]

The name of this site is Investorshub. It is my belief the majority of people come here for research and discussion of companies that may be potential candidates for investments. This is not a scientific community, although, certainly, there will be some folks with scientific knowledge.

Similarly, all the interviews that Diwan and Seymour do on YouTube and the pay-to-play "News" sites and the majority of other material they publish are not done for scientific purposes or targeted at the scientific community; they are done to lure people to invest in NNVC. If you want, one could compare their strategy to that of the Venus Fly Trap, luring their victims with the sweet scent of significant progress in their drug development then snapping shut and trapping their assets in the event horizon of Diwan's Theracour money laundering black hole.

It is my belief that every word out of Seymour's mouth was, and now Diwan's seeing that he is now the mouthpiece for NNVC, is meant to deceive.

You offer a sage strategy: bowing out before it gets any thicker. I agree and shall do the same for now. I have many more productive things to do. I have found a few interesting brick walls I'd like to engage in conversation and I think the discussions I have with them will be much more fruitful than those I find here.

Enjoy your Sunday.

[arvitar]

The industry meaning of “drug” is the same:, and coincides with the one given in most American English dictionaries and assumed by those on the streets:

Drug: a substance used as a medication or in the preparation of medication, according to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; or a substance recognized in an official pharmacopoeia or formulary.


In the industry, and when communicating to the investing public, one typically refers to candidates being developed as “pipeline leads” or preclinical candidates.

Even though neither Seymour nor Diwan had any training or experience remotely related to drug development, and they’re both yokels, it’s hard to believe they had some different meaning of “drug” they assumed the investing public shared.

It’s similar to their repeated use of the phrase “no evidence of toxicity “ without ever having completed the IND-required toxicology studies. They either had a different meaning of those words, or intended to mislead.