InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

jhalada

01/19/07 10:45 AM

#6155 RE: kpf #6154

Klaus,

I guess it depends how ambitious you want to get. Maybe the later time to market implies a more ambitious design, rather than just integrating existing design on the same die. We will see...

Joe
icon url

CombJelly

01/20/07 9:54 PM

#6185 RE: kpf #6154

"if pad-limitations allow for the latter to take ten dollars cost out of the platform."

Hard to be pad limited for flip chip. There isn't an I/O ring like for wire bonding. The "pads" are distributed across the face of the chip.

"Bottom line, this industry has ever been about integration, which will eventually end in a SoC"

Sure. But that will also mean that the race for performance and/or features has slowed. Now there are some synergies that can be exploited, but I suspect they aren't all that great.