InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

dshade

04/07/21 7:42 AM

#143321 RE: mfaphoto #143320

agreed. BUT the high volume days over 200mil have moved this up well previously. Need credible news with specifics and those volumes numbers will return putting this over .10, THEN 10-1, why not?
icon url

mfaphoto

04/07/21 7:58 AM

#143325 RE: mfaphoto #143320

Continuing my prior post. It would seem the best time to do a reverse split would be when the ticker changes. It would then be seen as a new stock. TSNP did a reverse split and changed to HMBL at the same time, I believe.
icon url

Step-by-Step

04/07/21 8:25 AM

#143328 RE: mfaphoto #143320

A r/s would effectively destroy all value for existing share holders. Thats what happens 99.99% of the time It may pave the way, maybe though VERY unlikely for positive change in the future.......but current shareholders would be screwed. NO DOUBT
icon url

varmit

04/07/21 9:02 AM

#143338 RE: mfaphoto #143320

Old fashioned way!!!
Earn it !!!!
If nsav is real and works trading crypto, then it gains SHAREPRICE from earnings !!!!
“Earn it”
It’s risk now but reward is 1000 fold
The weak should not be here!
icon url

lasserplus1

04/07/21 9:04 AM

#143342 RE: mfaphoto #143320

That is crazy talk! The company already has a clause in their bylaws to prevent a R/S. So why even bring it up!!! A buyback and retirement of shares makes more sense. As someone else suggested, it would screw current shareholders. I have had that happen to me before. Stop talking about stuff like that! Are you crazy!