I was curious after your post and did a quick search, and got a laugh at my results. Just for some humor, you are incorrect, Whatsup...
Zac is listed on the 10k.
He is listed in 2 different sections. He is listed under the pending lawsuits as defendant. and he appears to also be the only listed exception to the non-solicitation clause. So I'm interpreting that as him being the only one they are ok with being solicited away from the company without needing to wait the 6 month requirement. That is a little funny and telling. I am thinking it means there might be a transition away from his advising sooner than later, to you point though. I may be interpreting that slightly wrong, as it's not my forte, but listing a specific employee, in otherwise boilerplate language is something I'm a little thrown by.
Perhaps there are good things to come if they can get real leadership in soon and make us a few $.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
