InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

chxal

04/02/21 10:21 AM

#9381 RE: PHAN #9377

PHAN --read the fine print in article:

Abbott’s rapid test initially required a health care provider to administer the swab and solution-based test kit,

and then it was authorized for at-home use with a virtual proctor watching the process, which was included with the $25 fee.

This new FDA authorization allows an individual to perform the test themselves, without a doctor’s prescription and at a lower cost.

So these are not the same as CoviStix. What in the hell is a "virtual proctor"??? Isn't this an arm of the federal registry, etc. for TRACKING RESULTS??? The author just slipped in this "virtual proctor" without describing any details at all.

Just strengthens my belief that a TRUE, Independent, self on-the-spot test where the consumer gets a result him or herself without govt involvement in any way, will NOT BE APPROVED.... THIS IS WHY COVI-STIX IS NOT BEING APPROVED PEOPLE, GOVT, CDC, NIH, BIDEN, AND EVERYONE ELSE DOES NOT WANT INDIVIDUALS KNOWING THEIR COVID STATUS WITHOUT THE GOVT[b ]ALSO KNOWING AT THE SAME TIME BECAUSE THEY WILL LOSE CONTROL OF THE NUMBERS AND THE NARRATIVE

And I believe Ji already knows this and has decided not to take it public, and is instead trying to get other stuff approved INSTEAD OF FIGHTING IT!!!