InvestorsHub Logo

GVX808

03/31/21 12:43 PM

#14305 RE: medchem #14304

You were actually wrong. The data was great!

The stock's reaction is confusing, but I think it will gain traction with an EUA and further details on scarring etc. The 20mg dose essentially performed perfectly. Probably better than anyone expected
It seems safe to assume the 40mg dose was more of the same and not needed.

Ifenprodil is obviously amazing stuff for this application.


"Told ya!" ???

I will refrain from insulting you on that baseless remark.

Jgregsr

03/31/21 12:46 PM

#14306 RE: medchem #14304

very mature...would someone pls post the january preliminary data

Money $hot

03/31/21 2:02 PM

#14308 RE: medchem #14304

Nice input. I'm guessing that was your best "scientific analysis" of the matter. Now I truly question your need to be "right' moving forward. Specifically as it relates to already having told everyone you're out. Welcome back to the Abyss. Looking forward to many sideline comments and complaints.

Holla @ me

M$

PostScript

Mackie Research has a bs bullet point/hit list/cheat sheet for any would be scientists who wants to fake it til they make it.