Replies to post #112212 on Bayport International Holdings Inc. (BAYP)

[rawman]

SEC needs to be held accountable for the entrapment imo

Disagree! The SOCIAL MEDIA PROMOTERS, which were clearly cited in the SEC's Suspension Order, but overlooked in your posts, should be slammed with Government civil actions and possibly criminal actions, based on SHARE PRICE MANIPULATION and committing SECURITIES FRAUD!

When the SEC's investigation of BAYP is finally completed, there is a good chance some of the insiders, including Paul Strickland, John Kellas, and possibly BAYP, will be facing legal action by the SEC and/or the DOJ! Kellas' Florida lawsuit against BAYP for non-payment of debt obligations is a total load of crap!

[tdbowieknife]

Lol... One can file a complaint with the SEC.

By the way... OTC Markets unaudited "disclosure statements" don't qualify as "filings". An attorney letter means even less.

.

Buyer Beware

Obvious Pump and dump scam

Busted Grey Market scam




..

[DragonBear]

News, Filings, reports....any activity should qualify as news

Even if it states nothing news worthy? What does this mean:

Bayport International Holdings, Inc. is a holding company that focuses on real estate development and acquisitions.

How does a company claim to be focused on real estate development, and acquisitions without any capital? No collateral assets to obtain capital? No access to capital?

Now that in itself isn't going to attract SEC attention. Scams make meaningless claims all the time. Instead one has a Strickland playing a game of gaining control of worthless stock (via ther preferred), R/Sing the common stock 1:10000, and then arranging to sell stock for "debt". And what benefit does a Strickland derive from these gyrations? Is he going through all of this just to help "Top Knot" make money, out of the goodness of his heart? Where he gets nothing out of the deal? The SEC is investigating the connections.

Then while all of this happens in the background, suddenly one has actors in tweet ville pumping away about what? That's right real estate development.

why the SEC be so anal?

In another words they should allow scams to occur, without resistance? Anything goes?

SEC needs to be held accountable for the entrapment

What entrapment? The only entrapment occurred when retail "investors" believed the hype about a worthless scam stock. The SEC is not responsible for what retail "investors" (dreamers) choose to believe.