That explanation does not make sense. To say you are not concerned with Spencer's lack of performance because it has allowed you to make money flipping the stock is one thing. To say that lack of performance is not concerning is another. It is unlikely most holders are here only for a FOMO ride. On the contrary, reviewing posts for the last couple of years it is pretty clear people expected Spencer to deliver and were looking for a longer term play.
Objectively, there is not excuse for Spencer's lack of performance, lack of compliance (i.e., multiple, protracted time under a STOP) and failure to deliver while diluting shares by over 75% and going radio silent for months on end.
Good for flipping is not good for business. Uplisting and/or dividends are just pipe dreams for such an organization.
For some, it may feel better to defend the dream than acknowledge the facts but those facts don't change. Others may not care because they can use the volatility to make money. Neither makes Spencer a competent CEO.
Maybe a FOMO ride is the best we can hope for . . . .
My opinions only.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
