Not sure at this point which is more appropriate, but claiming your tech is superior to those that preceed you based on no data? Based on what...because you and MM say so? Pure conjecture at this point.
Wonderful write up that further supports what I have been saying all along;
ALLM is even referenced in it as to the reason why Daniel didn't buy the Florida plant. This was written 2 years ago and the ALLM offer for the FL plant was in 2017 and pulled. Wonder why? Is it because they were nowhere near ready to drop in their tech? Remember, they are no further along to commercializing this today than they were 3-4years ago when ALLM was going to buy a plant. I don't think they ever intended to, just hoped the news of buying one would bring more investors. Let that sink in... Enough of FL plant, looks like as you say, you will have your pick of any failed ethanol plant to acquire and build off of. I wonder, what will the condition of the equipment at those plants be by the time you are ready.
Anywho...there are some wonderful talking points in this article that the serious investor should be asking mgmt how what they are doing will provide any different or better results than those in this article. Remember, >90% have failed and closed to this point. How will ALLM succeed when everyone else has failed...and still no one knows of you? What of the pretreatment issues, the corrosion issues? So far, all you got is conjecture, hyperbole or just plain hubris with no factual data to back up your claims
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
