InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

marketmann

01/16/07 4:05 PM

#244244 RE: S.A.G. #244241

Investors should not rely on any statements purporting to be by or on behalf of the Company other than those contained in this release or any future press releases issued by the Company.

how's that for starters? you are still posting hearsay facts, when management has told everyone not to believe you.
who's lying?

as for your question, dont have a clue, and will not guess.
icon url

Coopermun

01/16/07 4:45 PM

#244268 RE: S.A.G. #244241

No pun intended Hog, but Airys, when you wrestle with a pig, he enjoys it and you both get dirty. Ok, not original but true, too.
So let's just try not going to their poison party and wait for the hearing evidence which is only info that is significant for now. And I didn't disclose the affidavit but I can guess which basher did. And by the way clowns with no lives, your "helping newbies" approach to profit and "burn and earn" approach to investing is as greedy as the liars. Nice chip on your shoulder attitude to life which leaves you with this talent for pointing out what's wrong again and again. Definitely cost us money no matter how you spin your non-involvement.
Go catch that whopper, Airys!
icon url

HabaneroDog

01/16/07 5:54 PM

#244280 RE: S.A.G. #244241

Who cares....what does it have to do with the lying cheats at the company?
icon url

S.A.G.

01/16/07 6:34 PM

#244287 RE: S.A.G. #244241

Here are two very simple questions I asked last week right here:

1) Who gave the scanned copy of the ORIGINAL affidavit on or after Jan 8 to an individual when TOM ANDERSON himself said to me that he was unaware that anything was handed out.

2) Who authorized it's posting on the internet? Was it the OSC?


I still haven't received a reply from anybody about this. How convenient. At least you all know where I got my info. I never hid that from anybody and like an idiot I posted it only to get me tons of headaches. Only shows you where my heart is.

Airys418



icon url

janice shell

01/16/07 6:43 PM

#244293 RE: S.A.G. #244241

Here are two very simple questions I asked last week:

1) Who gave the scanned copy of the ORIGINAL affidavit on or after Jan 8 to a poster?

2) Who authorized it's posting on the internet? Was it the OSC?

I still haven't received a reply and I bet I won't.


Your "simple questions" were answered several dozen times. I guess you just didn't like the answers.