Again, nowhere in there does it directly state that he worked for them. IF he did, then I don't know why he wouldn't strengthen his claim on his tweets to include that information. Also, the article discusses plans for the company, so there's no way to know if any of those plans were actually carried out. It says in the article of plans to become current by July 2018 under George Sharp's help, but as you can tell, none of those plans actually came to fruition. The article even has a caveat at the bottom which says that the information stated in the article is a "forward-looking statement". So, if plans should change, the article is no longer valid. Also, I have some of George Sharp's own tweets to show that he has NO IDEA about any of the new developments of this company. For instance:
George Sharp claimed CCTL had no working number. WRONG. The number works fine and a number of us have successfully gotten through.
George Sharp also claims that he couldn't find the bitcoin on their financials. WRONG. They're listed under a different category in the amount of their purchase price. Bitcoin is NOT listed as millions of dollars on the balance sheet unless the bitcoin is sold, which it wasn't. Here's his tweet showing his mistake:
You say that he has insider information, but he has never ONCE showed anyone that he knows more than the average person regarding details of this company. Even if he did know anything about the company, his information is 3 years old. I'm sure that a lot has changed and moved along since that time.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
