Replies to post #51296 on Greenshift Corporation (GERS)

[ballot123]

Thanks, nobody and sox, for the clarification on minnows on up to humpbacks. I certainly agree that 400,000 plus is a whale in anyone's book. Interesting how fast this becomes "you show me yours, I'll show you mine". I think we'll see .44 plus again in the not-too-distant future, but I did take a narwhal
off the table lately to feed the family( of Dolphins, of course). Cheers.

[Harry Winston]

My point was and still is that because the GERS price is not justified by any financial data that Greenshift released during the past four years (there isn't any of it), every large investor should've seen or sensed a change in the price trend that was triggered by Monday's decision of the Supreme Court.

These large investors should've sold most of their shares, regardless of whether they had a profit or not, because today's closing price is less than half of what they could've received for their shares.

Even though the court decision was very bad news for the company, much of the public was unaware of the importance of the lawsuit to Greenshift. That's why the GERS price rose after the opening of the market. This very short-term price trend was a huge missed opportunity for every large investor who didn't sell.