Thanks. I did that to try to understand it. Think I got it now! Your extrapolations are good. I keep coming back to the statement he made. Something happened on or around the filing due date that needed to be disclosed and caused the delay in the 10-Q.
Why would something - a “development” - that occurred on Feb. 16 need to be included in the 10-Q for the fourth quarter ending Dec. 31?
Put another way, what could have developed that not only needed to be disclosed, but, because it happened on or around the due date, was important enough to delay the filing of the 10-Q but didn’t need to be disclosed until five calendar days later?
Anyway...we’ll know soon enough.
Go IPIX!