InvestorsHub Logo

The ELTP King

02/17/21 12:00 AM

#351432 RE: no2koolaid #351431

My goodness we're about to be bought!!!


I said this before but it is clear it needs a reprise to capture this Q…

In 2013, Elite was illiquid and incapable of getting bank funding. In fact, longer term, without increased revenues Elite was looking at potential bankruptcy. But that is more than increasing revenues, it was about controlling costs and increasing margins…and it is to have current assets that offset liabilities. When the record breaking FY 2020 came around, we saw Elite had turned things around not merely by increasing revenues but by controlling costs. For example…

In 2020, Total Current Assets = $10,251,279
Total Current Liabilities = $8,639,548
Thus: 10,251,279 / 8,639,548 = 1.19

This is > 1.0 that is the benchmark against which companies fiscal management is measured. Anything beyond 1.0 removes concerns about immediate economic viability and meant Elite had the ability to pay its short term debt; that which is most pressing.

NOW…Let’s turn to Q3 2021…

Current Assets were $14,539,170. Current liabilities were $7,242,350. The math is simple and shows Elite’s ability to pay its short term debt at 2.008 X or almost double of their previous record year. Is there any confusion that Elite’s financial position is increasingly better? If so, there should not be.

So, how about one more metric?

For FY 2020, Elite’s Total Revenues = $17,994,639. In 2021, revenues through three quarters were $20,985,218. That means Elite has already beaten 2020’s record revenues by $2,990,579…and, if they come in with even “just” another $6 M in revenues, they will have beaten their 2020 record by nearly 50%.

The problem with that is what?




YJ4LIFE

02/17/21 12:57 AM

#351437 RE: no2koolaid #351431

This great post deserves a sticky! Thanks N2K!!

I said this before but it is clear it needs a reprise to capture this Q…

In 2013, Elite was illiquid and incapable of getting bank funding. In fact, longer term, without increased revenues Elite was looking at potential bankruptcy. But that is more than increasing revenues, it was about controlling costs and increasing margins…and it is to have current assets that offset liabilities. When the record breaking FY 2020 came around, we saw Elite had turned things around not merely by increasing revenues but by controlling costs. For example…

In 2020, Total Current Assets = $10,251,279
Total Current Liabilities = $8,639,548
Thus: 10,251,279 / 8,639,548 = 1.19

This is > 1.0 that is the benchmark against which companies fiscal management is measured. Anything beyond 1.0 removes concerns about immediate economic viability and meant Elite had the ability to pay its short term debt; that which is most pressing.

NOW…Let’s turn to Q3 2021…

Current Assets were $14,539,170. Current liabilities were $7,242,350. The math is simple and shows Elite’s ability to pay its short term debt at 2.008 X or almost double of their previous record year. Is there any confusion that Elite’s financial position is increasingly better? If so, there should not be.

So, how about one more metric?

For FY 2020, Elite’s Total Revenues = $17,994,639. In 2021, revenues through three quarters were $20,985,218. That means Elite has already beaten 2020’s record revenues by $2,990,579…and, if they come in with even “just” another $6 M in revenues, they will have beaten their 2020 record by nearly 50%.

The problem with that is what?


dr_lowenstein

02/17/21 1:06 AM

#351439 RE: no2koolaid #351431

Lol lets see if the market buys that BS

Sankarad1

02/17/21 7:22 AM

#351449 RE: no2koolaid #351431

Hi N2K,

Thank you for the great post.

While I do believe that the company is still far from a BO, I will be curious to understand how a potential buyer would dissect/analyze/evaluate this company based on the stats you provided as well as the other things that the company owns.

Will it be possible for you to shed some light? This gives some qualitative and quantitative understanding of the company's worth in the eyes of a typical buyer.

Would immensely appreciate your response and thanks in advance for it.

Je3232

02/17/21 7:26 AM

#351450 RE: no2koolaid #351431

Missing one metric - price per
Share

jgsnys

02/17/21 7:47 AM

#351454 RE: no2koolaid #351431

The problem with that is, "over promise and under deliver"
Whoo-hoo! $6,000,000.

dest_golf

02/17/21 8:01 AM

#351456 RE: no2koolaid #351431

expected this.. so yea its all good, with the exception of declining revenue over the previous two quarters.. assuming that trend continues, that's a problem and simply ignoring it while convenient for some, but certainly not wise. Ignoring that fact is like saying.. look the boat is floating better than ever, regardless of that leak that continues to grow.

namtae

02/17/21 8:53 AM

#351474 RE: no2koolaid #351431

Here's what the problem with that is.

The problem with that is what?



Using a ratio which indicates Elites ability to service its short term obligations is light years away from being characterized as a metric which measures managements fiscal management. It's one of MANY!!

This is > 1.0 that is the benchmark against which companies fiscal management is measured.



The above statement of analysis is simply ridiculous

Managements performance is measured by many, many metrics, both financially and non-financial. The current ratio is just one of those. Others are profitability ratios, asset efficiencies, employee satisfaction, quality metrics etc and of course, share price/valuation which one way or another affects all the above

PERIOD!

namtae

02/17/21 10:06 AM

#351510 RE: no2koolaid #351431

It appears that healthy current ratio isnt impressing shareholders who are dumping ELTP shares this morning

Je3232

02/17/21 10:06 AM

#351511 RE: no2koolaid #351431

The biggest problem is we are done well over 20 percent and trading in the fives again. This stock abs company continues to disappoint

Time for Nasrat to resign. Leave and bring in a new CEO. Clean house