Yes but...
There's two reasons to be detailed
One is, you didn't do what you were hoping however there is a promising subgroup, and it takes detailed analysis to show it
Two is, you knocked it out of the park so big nobody will believe you unless you dot every i and cross every T
6 months is short for any research analysis
For top-line data, sure, all pre-specified
In favor of the later option there, we have all along been talking about changing the standard of care
I didn't like it, this approach to reporting, but the more I think about it the more important it is
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
