Replies to post #35779 on Cel Sci Corporation (CVM)

[lightrock]

Yes but...

There's two reasons to be detailed

One is, you didn't do what you were hoping however there is a promising subgroup, and it takes detailed analysis to show it

Two is, you knocked it out of the park so big nobody will believe you unless you dot every i and cross every T

6 months is short for any research analysis

For top-line data, sure, all pre-specified

In favor of the later option there, we have all along been talking about changing the standard of care

I didn't like it, this approach to reporting, but the more I think about it the more important it is