Because there is no second transaction. So that's all you get is fairytales . How anyone can read the actual monitors report on the outcome of the bankruptcy and come up with anything other then a liquidation is hilarious. As previously reported to the Court in our role as Monitor, the tangible assets of the Companies were sold. There were insufficient proceeds from those sales to satisfy the claims of secured and unsecured creditors in full. The Monitor has distributed the funds in its hands from the liquidation of the Companies' assets to the secured creditors of the Companies as directed by the Court.
There was no plan of compromise or arrangement made in the CCAA Proceedings in respect of the Companies to otherwise address creditor claims. As such those claims remain outstanding and rank in priority to equity claims.
Exactly! Why is it always snippets(both parties).? Shouldn’t such a straightforward liquidation of an empty corn sludge shell be snippet /CA/redacted free?! Thank for sharing your opinion! I agree! There’s definitely more than meets the eye here