Leo isn't twisting anyone's arm to remain a shareholder.
Don't like the fact that Leo didn't specifically tell you when the trial started...well...send Leo a email and tell'em "hasta la vista" and call your broker.
You say he didn't tell you whether or not IPIX got the grant money? Give Leo the old "heave-ho."
Or better yet, why not simply recognize that the IPIX-COVID trial is different from all previous trials with the involvement of an RBL and peer review, gov't fixation & financing, along with public scrutiny of this indication.
Additionally, we should recognize that Leo probably has more external forces acting on him in this trial than was present in previous trials.
The notion that external forces could be affecting Leo's PR behavior should not be dismissed. Who is to say what limiting effects all these stakeholders might have on the timeliness and content of Leo's communications.
This time really is different.
Message in reply to:
And not only did the trial probably start, IP probably got the grant too, to study other viruses. We never heard otherwise, right? And why should Leo tell anybody- keep the doubters on their toes!
Maybe he started B OM 3 and B UC oral trials too.
But he just is not saying because IP is so crazy like a fox.
I agree- run the company and move it forward and never tell anyone about it.
Until you finally do tell someone.
I wonder when that will be?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
