Replies to post #23660 on CLST Holdings Inc (CLHI)

[mikec328]

Well said!

[Obumer]

THANKS RG17 for that excellent summation. Hopefully Stephenson will reconsider and adjust accordingly. Thanks again

[Papes]

My thoughts exactly on the better approach the company could take and should take with respect to SS, price and benefit to TDS and shareholders. Great comments R17.

[trademax42]

Hi Renegades....yes I should have mentioned in the post the timing for a RS was misplaced, should have waited for this thing to grow organically first.

Nothing is set in stone. Waiting for the updates.

$CLHI

Just my opinion.

[Paul Brentjens]

You are very right, I expected your way too, but unfortunately it didn't go that way. But 1 remark, if I may :

"I would have expected 5-10% of the pro forma ownership."

That is still possible, I give you 1 of many examples :

Imagine TDS explains it : they do the RS. Then they use some of the 100M shares to pay done and coming acquisitions. And keep the rest of the 100M as a treasury for other purposes (amongst them future acquisitions).

We'll see in the coming pr.

[Vulcanized Crawler]

i agree with you....but,
first management has to learn to stop being so stupid