I would obviously be in the right place...
For example, absolutely nothing that SCOTUS rules on will (a) stop the exercise of the Treasury's warrants for 80% of the common nor (b) stop FHFA/Treasury offering huge amounts of new common nor (c) stop FHFA/Treasury offering to convert all JPS to new common at the price of the new offering
SCOTUS is ruling on completely orthogonal matter... but, of course, I don;t know what I am talking about
GL to all longs, some will need