InvestorsHub Logo

crossball

02/07/21 1:28 PM

#40302 RE: chemist72 #40301

huh, what?...that would put Mark's goal for integrity straight to the outhouse...it is graphite or bust for his said search for integrity.

marinokv

02/07/21 1:32 PM

#40304 RE: chemist72 #40301

hello all, on checking sjc, this is the first time they have requested a voluntary halt, due to news, and stock is trading higher, previous to halt.
imo, and only mine, shares here were driven down and market makers ate them up. NOW ,i referred to this occurring in another stock i own and then it flew up. while sjc is not sthc, i do believe that they have a working relationship, according to older posts placed here. i could be wrong but i will be buying shares here in the am, i am one cautious person with my money , however i do believe with marks insistence on caution, shares driven down, sjc halt, all combined together, this could be it. i may be wrong, but we shall see, if so, my opinion is one day in the future they will be worth more anyway. the force is with us all, and enjoy the super bowl,hehe.

No1Uknow

02/07/21 7:35 PM

#40314 RE: chemist72 #40301

there is not enough evidence for that, but lets see what the next news is, should be early am release.

staynafloat

02/07/21 8:40 PM

#40315 RE: chemist72 #40301

I hope not too but for that to happen SJC would have to be a part of Ameca Group ... at least as far as what Mark said in the last PR ... IMO

Lot's of unknown's wright now unfortunately.