InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

HokieHead

02/07/21 8:41 AM

#23321 RE: Renegades17 #23320

Simply stated, for the CLHI share price, the perceived speculative value was in the $0.30-$0.50 area where I figured it should have been until merger figures and financial statements came out, not in the $1.50-$2 area that this was pushed to on fairytale stories by shareholders for months.

I got blasted for it and now anyone who was a new investor here since the beginning of December is now underwater and anyone (and I saw a ton of it) who averaged up the past 2 months is underwater as well.

I would throw any valuation models out at this point until things become more clear. They, imo, are now not only reverse splitting 23 million shares, if they are smart they are going to sell shares to pay for debt, etc. and max out the shares to the authorized amount and then reverse split the 150-200 million outstanding down 1/15. Dirty but it’s how it’s done.

I was surprised to see Friday’s volume so low. It was only 1.7 million which is like 2-3 holders here alone, to me it means of the CLHI shareholders that own 12+ million in total many didn’t sell. Had the volume been 15-20 million or so I’d say the bottom may be in but I think this week will see more pressured selling and it back to the $0.25 level fast. And this time around, even at $0.25 I am not buying in, too many unknowns at this point and the first impression from a filing standpoint with this company (1/15 RS) is not impressive.
icon url

Dusty2

02/07/21 9:00 AM

#23322 RE: Renegades17 #23320

Well said, Renegades17.
icon url

ChiefZ

02/07/21 9:37 AM

#23323 RE: Renegades17 #23320

Pretty much sums up all the thoughts and emotions of this debacle into one post. Hope Stephenson starts to get it. So far it doesnt seem that way.
icon url

mikec328

02/07/21 9:47 AM

#23324 RE: Renegades17 #23320

Agreed! Well said!
icon url

mikec328

02/07/21 9:48 AM

#23325 RE: Renegades17 #23320

Someone please sticky this
icon url

Papes

02/07/21 11:21 AM

#23329 RE: Renegades17 #23320

Excellent summary R17. Agreed.
icon url

trademax42

02/07/21 12:12 PM

#23338 RE: Renegades17 #23320

Thank you Renegades17. A well put together post.

I have been telling in similar messages on the timing and excessiveness of the RS. The timing was horrible, they should have allowed the stock to grow organically first before deciding on a RS. Second the ratio of 1:15 is excessive, unnecessary and extremely damaging to shareholders' interest .

I've been also reiterating the RS is not set in stone. The CEO and/or the Board can either cancel this corporate action or lower the ratio to a more reasonable level, say at 1:5. I'm speaking for myself, I'll be okay with a RS 1:5 if that what's needed to uplist.

They probably did it on the advice of investment bankers without proper analysis of the market repercussions in the OTC.

Damage can be repaired if the CEO shows leadership and listens to the shareholders. TDS is a data service company, they should look at the most immediate data...a 65% decline in share price on Friday. The market has spoken and its their turn (TDS) to listen to the market.

$CLHI

Just my opinion, do your own dd.