InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

janice shell

02/06/21 9:43 PM

#5026 RE: Snizzle #5025

I disagree. Robinhood had a net capital deficiency. If it hadn't found a way to deal with that, ALL of its customers, many more than were playing GME and the other companies, would have suffered.

Blame the NSCC. As I've said many times, in the markets, nobody's gonna accept your risk.
icon url

Agoura Guy

02/06/21 9:45 PM

#5027 RE: Snizzle #5025

WALL STREET IS CORRUPT TO THE CORE, JUST AS THE SHILLS ARE WHO COME OUT OF THE CRACKS TO DEFEND THEIR OBVIOUS CRIMINAL ACTIVITY!

NAKED SHORTING IS ***ILLEGAL***!!!!

icon url

OMOLIVES

02/06/21 10:06 PM

#5035 RE: Snizzle #5025

? Not sure what you are saying here ... "Retail traders should not have been spooked or locked out"

"All involved" were limited on both sides of the trade. All new orders were limited(etc)...on either side. For god's sake ...there are SEC rules that halt shorting after a specified percentage drop..be it uptick rules..et al. Schmuck' city....and so it goes...